No response submitted.
"For any Sharing Event during the Transition Period when there is insufficient holdback" - this should be hold back an voluntary offered capacity?
Program design in (Ops trials) have described that Voluntary holdback is assigned first and then positive sharing result holdback second. Shouldn’t the Transition period be operating in this same fashion? The way this document is written currently it leads you to believe that tiers apply first to positive sharing holdback, and then to voluntary offered.. I think a clarification of what holdback is needed.. Holdback = positive sharing plus voluntary offered……. And that may ultimately end up in definition in BPM 204 but we don’t have it with this BPM so it needs to be clear and called out.
Holdback and Voluntary Holdback need to be more clearly defined. This BPM seems to in contrast with how Structured Testing is being taught regarding Voluntary Holdback priority with a positive sharing calculation.
A positive sharing calculation is verified by the FS data that is loaded into the OPS client tool. How is Voluntary Holdback verified for a surplus entity since this surplus is considered above and beyond the Sharing Calculation result?
Which takes priority? VH or Surplus Sharing Calculation result? Which is allotted first to WRAP?
No response submitted.