Request Summary
BPM 103 P50 Peak Load Forecast Methodology Fix to enable Participant-to-Participant Load Transfer
Co-sponsors
- Garrison Marr (Lead Sponsor), Public Utility District No.1 of Snohomish County, GBMarr@snopud.com, 425-309-6923
- Steve Bellcoff, Bonneville Power Administration, srbellcoff@bpa.gov, 360-901-5208
- Ed Mount, The Energy Authority, emount@teainc.org
- Rebecca Sexton, Western Power Pool, rebecca.sexton@westernpowerpool.org, 253-279-3002
Description Of Issue
The Winter and the Summer P50 Peak Load Forecast Methodologies in BPM 103 fail to adequately capture discrete load additions or subtractions of loads in the medium term (as those changes gradually become part of the five years of historical load data used to calculate the monthly P50 Peak Load Forecasts). These discrete load changes could be additions and subtractions, in scenarios where load is existing or new, meaning historical load data exists or does not, respectively. Clear direction and a robust policy for discrete load changes is important for all Participants experiencing discrete load changes, but is of particular consequence when one Participant transfers the responsibility for its load and resources in its entirety to another Participant, as is anticipated by Snohomish PUD’s transition in BPA service contracts, resulting in BPA representation of Snohomish’s load in October 2025. |
Proposed Solution
|
Specific Document And Language
Business Practice Manual (BPM 103) Participant Forward Showing Capacity Requirement
Suggested Language Update
See attachment.
Benefits
The BPM 103 P50 Peak Load Forecast methodology incorrectly captures load changes by only amending the result rather than the underlying data. It is critical that this methodology is fixed.
Data Or Information