STEVE KERNS | NLSL Group
JERRET FISCHER | SRP
No comment.
STEFAN CRISTEA | Portland …
No comments.
RAJ HUNDAL | PWX
MATT HAYES | BPA
- Bonneville suggests that this section be re written so that is clearly articulates the following: 1) How a single workbook can be used (with all requirements of loads and transmission), and 2) clearly identify any and all additional requirements that the participant has to use the lower FSPRM factor.
LINDSEY SCHLEKEWAY | NVE
BENJAMIN FAULKINBERRY | PacifiCor…
PacifiCorp would appreciate additional language in this section on how these loads are combined to reach a total P50 load forecast. PacifiCorp is of the view that loads in two subregions should be combined on a coincident peak basis for use in the P50 peak calculations, as opposed to a summation of two non-coincident peaks. For example, if load in one subregion peaks on July 10th, and load in the other subregion peaks on July 13th, while the coincident peak of both loads occurred on July 12th, the coincident July 12th peak value should be used for modeling purposes.
TYLER MOORE | Arizona P…
Should this say Sections 2 through 7 or is there a different way that Demand Response should be handled by Participants submitting loads from multiple subregions?
SOMMER MOSER | Pepple Mo…
SANDEAP REDDY | Puget Sou…
No Comment.