ANNE SIMON | Public
Simply a deterrent for any participant to become binding before they can meet all FS requirements without question.
MICHAEL WATKINS | Seattle C…
City Light suggests that Participants who use the No-JCAF option should be included in the group of participants that ETD revenue is distributed. City Light recommends that the following language be deleted from Section 7: “and did not exercise the No-JCAF Option.”
JONATHAN HART | EWEB
Suggest changing “A Participant that, as a result of applying ETDs under Section 17.3 of the WRAP Tariff, pays no Deficiency Charge as to a Binding Season, shall not be deemed...” to ‘...pays zero Deficiency Charge...’
TYLER MOORE | Arizona P…
Is it accurate to say that a Participant could pay no Deficiency Charge by utilizing ETDs under the Section 17.3 of the Tariff, our reading says that they would pay a reduced Deficiency Charge. If accurate, then the wording in this section should be updated to reflect the paying of reduced Deficiency Charge does not result in a Participant with no Deficiency Charges”.
SANDEAP REDDY | Puget Sou…
No comment at this time.