PacifiCorp appreciates the additional language which more clearly details the priority with which Participants are expected to view WRAP holdback deliveries.

City Light supports the concept of WRAP having a Presumptive Waiver for Uncertainty Exceedances and has no further comment regarding the text in RED.

BPA requests clarification that the attestation only pertains to the capacity identified to meet the FS capacity requirement. Suggest the following edit to 7.4 – iii. – “…and sourced from its Qualify Resources reported in its FS Submittal and used to meet the Forward Showing Capacity requirement".

Tacoma Power supports the clarification that Bonneville Power Administration requests to be added to 7.4 – 1. – iii., and believes the suggested language is intuitive and is consistent with the intent of the current draft of BPM 209. (“. . . and sourced from its Qualifying Resources reported in its FS Submittal and used to meet the Forward Showing Capacity requirement . . .”)