02: Please supply any comments related to the Presumptive Waiver for Uncertainty Exceedances section (7.4) - text in RED.

 | 
PROMPT 2
 |   | 



April 17, 2024, 2 p.m.
BENJAMIN FAULKINBERRY | PacifiCor…

PacifiCorp appreciates the additional language which more clearly details the priority with which Participants are expected to view WRAP holdback deliveries.


April 18, 2024, 9:22 a.m.
MICHAEL WATKINS | Seattle C…

City Light supports the concept of WRAP having a Presumptive Waiver for Uncertainty Exceedances and has no further comment regarding the text in RED.


April 18, 2024, 12:03 p.m.
MATT HAYES | BPA

BPA requests clarification that the attestation only pertains to the capacity identified to meet the FS capacity requirement. Suggest the following edit to 7.4 – iii. – “…and sourced from its Qualify Resources reported in its FS Submittal and used to meet the Forward Showing Capacity requirement".


April 18, 2024, 3:29 p.m.
THAD LEVAR | Tacoma Po…

Tacoma Power supports the clarification that Bonneville Power Administration requests to be added to 7.4 – 1. – iii., and believes the suggested language is intuitive and is consistent with the intent of the current draft of BPM 209. (“. . . and sourced from its Qualifying Resources reported in its FS Submittal and used to meet the Forward Showing Capacity requirement . . .”)