PRC Comments / BPM 205 - Energy Deployment

Comment Submission

Benjamin F. PacifiCorp Energy Supply Management

Submitted Responses

BPM 205 - Energy Deployment

01: Please supply any comments related to the Introduction, Definitions, or Background sections.

No response submitted.

02: Please supply any comments related to the Confirming and Declining Energy Deployment section (3).

No response submitted.

03: Please supply any comments related to the Tagging and Scheduling section (4).

PacifiCorp would prefer a policy which requires Participants who have confirmed a need for Holdback to submit e-tags for the full requested Holdback amount on the Preschedule Day. If the Participant later has a reduced (or no) need for Holdback, any tag adjustments will result in a surplus for the providing Participant(s).

If Holdback is left untagged until T-60, there may be unforeseen consequences for the providing Participant, with limited (or no) time to cure. Organized market tests run before the T-60 timeframe, and altering a Participant’s interchange value while hourly market tests are still running may have negative impacts on the providing Participant.

04: Please supply any comments related to the Tagging and Scheduling - Energy Deployment Transmission Requirements section (4.1).

Please provide more information specifying acceptable transmission priority for WRAP Holdback e-tags.

05: Please supply any comments related to the After-the-Fact Energy Deployment Information section (5).

No response submitted.

06: Please supply any comment related to the Raise Hand Tool section (6).

No response submitted.

General Comment

No general comment submitted.