COMMENT FOR BPM 301 - Program Review Committee Workplan Development and Approval

Submitted Oct. 6, 2023, 12:16 p.m.



01: Please supply any comments related to the Introduction, Definitions, or Background sections.

No response submitted.

02: Please supply any comments related to the Change Request section (3).

No response submitted.

03: Please supply any comments related to the Change Request - Change Request Form section (3.1).

No response submitted.

04: Please supply any comments related to the Change Request - Compile Concepts section (3.2).

No response submitted.

05: Please supply any comments related to the Change Request - PRC Review of Concepts section (3.3).

No response submitted.

06: Please supply any comments related to the Change Request - Level of Effort Review section (3.4).

No response submitted.

07: Please supply any comments to the Workplan Development section (4).

No response submitted.

08: Please supply any comments to the Workplan Development - PRC Development of Workplan section (4.1).

No response submitted.

09: Please supply any comments to the Workplan Development - Draft Workplan Review Process section (4.2).

No response submitted.

10: Please supply any comments to the Workplan Development - Workplan Approval section (4.3).

No response submitted.

General Comment

Idaho Power appreciates WPP's work in drafting this BPM and thinks it sets forth a clear and reasonable process for considering changes suggested by stakeholders.  One additional scenario that Idaho Power suggests could be addressed is stakeholder requests for time-sensitive changes.  There could be situations where Participants, stakeholders, or the Program Administrator or Operator identify potential changes to fix critical issues or that need to be addressed urgently.  In that case, waiting for the annual workplan development and Board approval process may not be feasible.  It seems there should be a process for considering and potentially acting on more urgent requests for changes.

Thank you.

avatar