PRC Comments / Topic

2024-NTFP-004 (2024-CRF-006)

Closed Dec 18, 2024 to Jan 13, 2025 BPM 103 P50 Peak Load Forecast Methodology Fix to enable Participant-to-Participant Load Transfer

Comment Topic

Overview

Lead Sponsor's Description of the Issue:

The Winter and the Summer P50 Peak Load Forecast Methodologies in BPM 103 fail to adequately capture discrete load additions or subtractions of loads in the medium term (as those changes gradually become part of the five years of historical load data used to calculate the monthly P50 Peak Load Forecasts). 

These discrete load changes could be additions and subtractions, in scenarios where load is existing or new, meaning historical load data exists or does not, respectively. Clear direction and a robust policy for discrete load changes is important for all Participants experiencing discrete load changes but is of particular consequence when one Participant transfers the responsibility for its load and resources in its entirety to another Participant, as is anticipated by Snohomish PUD’s transition in BPA service contracts, resulting in BPA representation of Snohomish’s load in October 2025. 

Response Guide

Prompts

1 01. Please supply any comments related to Section Winter P50 Peak Load Forecast (4.1)
2 02. Please supply any comments related to Section Summer P50 Peak Load Forecast (4.2)
3 03. Please supply any comments related to Appendix A - P50 Peak Load Forecast Modifications Senior Official Attestation
4 General Comment

Responses

Comments Received