02: Please supply any comments related to the Advance Assessment Timeline section.




Oct. 5, 2023, 2:24 p.m.
RAJ HUNDAL | PWX
No response submitted.

Oct. 6, 2023, 7:43 a.m.
ANNE SIMON | Public

Neither Table 1 or Table 2 identify a specific delivery date for 'PO provides Participants with draft outputs'  does that mean it is part of the general review (September 15, and February 15)?

Table 1 seems to reference the September 15 and February 15 dates as the actual study and not the Advisory by colling them T-2 and T-1.

We need firm expected dates for Advisory outputs to be shared.


Oct. 6, 2023, 7:45 a.m.
ANNE SIMON | Public

Neither Table 1 or Table 2 identify a specific delivery date for 'PO provides Participants with draft outputs'  does that mean it is part of the general review (September 15, and February 15)?

Table 1 seems to reference the September 15 and February 15 dates as the actual study and not the Advisory by colling them T-2 and T-1.

We need firm expected dates for Advisory outputs to be shared.


Oct. 6, 2023, 2:38 p.m.
TYLER MOORE | Arizona P…

Is March 1st the correct date for the Participant provides data to Program Operator for Advance Assessment? APS only asks because I think we had a January 31st deadline for this year’s Advance Assessment.


Oct. 6, 2023, 4:45 p.m.
SACHI BEGUR | Puget Sou…

Table 1 is very concise and helpful to understand a lot of deadlines quickly and easily!


Oct. 6, 2023, 9:21 p.m.
BENJAMIN FAULKINBERRY | PacifiCor…

PAC believes participants would benefit from a centralized, live, rolling calendar of these activities and milestones (like today's BPM tracker) to help ensure participants are informed and prepared for various upcoming data submittals and reviews.