RAJ HUNDAL | PWX
ANNE SIMON | Public
Neither Table 1 or Table 2 identify a specific delivery date for 'PO provides Participants with draft outputs' does that mean it is part of the general review (September 15, and February 15)?
Table 1 seems to reference the September 15 and February 15 dates as the actual study and not the Advisory by colling them T-2 and T-1.
We need firm expected dates for Advisory outputs to be shared.
ANNE SIMON | Public
Neither Table 1 or Table 2 identify a specific delivery date for 'PO provides Participants with draft outputs' does that mean it is part of the general review (September 15, and February 15)?
Table 1 seems to reference the September 15 and February 15 dates as the actual study and not the Advisory by colling them T-2 and T-1.
We need firm expected dates for Advisory outputs to be shared.
TYLER MOORE | Arizona P…
Is March 1st the correct date for the Participant provides data to Program Operator for Advance Assessment? APS only asks because I think we had a January 31st deadline for this year’s Advance Assessment.
SACHI BEGUR | Puget Sou…
Table 1 is very concise and helpful to understand a lot of deadlines quickly and easily!
BENJAMIN FAULKINBERRY | PacifiCor…
PAC believes participants would benefit from a centralized, live, rolling calendar of these activities and milestones (like today's BPM tracker) to help ensure participants are informed and prepared for various upcoming data submittals and reviews.