PRC COMMENTS
  | 
BPM 102 - FORWARD SHOWING REL…

02: Please supply any comments related to the Study Scoping Process section (3).

PROMPT 1
 | 
PROMPT 2
 | 
PROMPT 3
 | 
PROMPT 4
 | 
PROMPT 5
 | 
PROMPT 6
 | 
PROMPT 7
 | 
PROMPT 8
 | 
PROMPT 9
 | 
PROMPT 10
 | 
PROMPT 11
 | 
PROMPT 12
 | 
PROMPT 13
 | 
PROMPT 14
 | 
PROMPT 15
 | 
PROMPT 16
 | 
PROMPT 17
 | 
PROMPT 18
 | 
GENERAL
avatar
Feb. 2, 2024, 3:23 p.m.
SACHI BEGUR | Puget Sou…
No response submitted.
avatar
Jan. 31, 2024, 5:23 p.m.
ADAM MORSE | BPA
No response submitted.
avatar
Feb. 2, 2024, 9:54 a.m.
JOHN CRIDER | EWEB

The BPM states that the PO will provide the Board and RAPC an opportunity to review the Study Scope document, but does not discuss what the process would be if the Board or RAPC objected to something in the Study Scope and wanted the PO to adjust.

Does the Study Scope require approval or acceptance by either the Board or RAPC, or both?

Feb. 2, 2024, 10:33 a.m.
JOHN MAYHEW | Public Se…
No response submitted.
avatar
Feb. 2, 2024, 12:56 p.m.
RAJ HUNDAL | PWX
No response submitted.
avatar
Feb. 2, 2024, 3:12 p.m.
TYLER MOORE | Arizona P…

APS suggests that we define the “timely opportunity” better for the Board and RAPC review of the LOLE Study Scope. Previously, it has worked well to have the RAPC informed at a meeting and then final scope decided at subsequent meeting.

avatar
Feb. 2, 2024, 4:34 p.m.
NICOLE BLACKWELL | Idaho Pow…
No response submitted.
Feb. 2, 2024, 5:27 p.m.
JERRET FISCHER | SRP

SRP appreciates the structured approach of the Study Scoping Process. SRP recommends the WPP clarify how the Board of Directors and RAPC comments are considered in the scoping process. This may improve transparency in the scoping process.