No response submitted.
No response submitted.
No response submitted.
No response submitted.
No response submitted.
APS recommends that additional information be put in the BPM on the reason LRZs are utilized in the LOLE Study, it is unclear to us the benefit they provide over just making the sub-regions of the WRAP footprint as (2) LRZs. Also, we think footnote 2 can be deleted as it looks like a duplicate of footnote 1.
No response submitted.
No response submitted.