16 Please supply any comments related to the Qualifying Capacity Contribution of Resources – Hybrid Facilities section.




July 3, 2023, 2:26 p.m.
IAN WHITE | SE
No response submitted.

July 10, 2023, 2:09 p.m.
MICHAEL WATKINS | Seattle C…

City Light has no comments on this section of the BP.


July 11, 2023, 7:50 a.m.
WILLIAM GODDARD | Calpine E…
No response submitted.

July 13, 2023, 2:50 p.m.
KATIE NELSON | BPA
No response submitted.

July 14, 2023, 12:41 p.m.
CONNOR CURSON | Powerex
No response submitted.

July 17, 2023, 3:37 p.m.
LEAH MARQUEZ-GLYNN | Tacoma Po…

The current methodology will need to be revisited at some point. There are plenty of studies out there suggesting that the ELCC of hybrid facilities is not equal to the sum of the ELCCs of each component. Typically, studies find that the ELCC of a hybrid facility is greater than the sum of the components. 


July 18, 2023, 8:54 a.m.
KATIE NELSON | BPA
No response submitted.

July 18, 2023, 9:28 a.m.
LORI HERMANSON | Avista
No response submitted.

July 18, 2023, 1:42 p.m.
TYLER MOORE | Arizona P…

Would the hybrid resources be restricted by a max combined capacity in the model? Or would the accreditation be done after treating them as standalone with summing the ELCC and capping to interconnection limit? It would help to clarify. APS would recommend modeling it appropriately with a combined capacity limit in the model.


July 18, 2023, 3:02 p.m.
LINDSEY SCHLEKEWAY | NVE
No response submitted.

July 18, 2023, 3:48 p.m.
AMY BURTON | PSE
No response submitted.

July 18, 2023, 3:50 p.m.
CAMILLE CHRISTEN | Idaho Pow…
No response submitted.

July 18, 2023, 4:28 p.m.
BENJAMIN FAULKINBERRY | PacifiCor…
No response submitted.

July 18, 2023, 4:29 p.m.
JERRET FISCHER | SRP

 No comment at this time.


July 18, 2023, 4:47 p.m.
SACHI BEGUR | Puget Sou…
No response submitted.