PRC COMMENTS

BPM 106 - Qualifying Contracts

Comments accepted March 21, 2024 to April 11, 2024





The Qualifying Contracts Business Practice Manual (BPM) fits into a suite of BPMs related to the Forward Showing Program of the WRAP. 

Please provide comments on the BPM 106 draft posted. Note that the BPM is meant to reflect the WRAP tariff, and comments on the BPM should not include suggestions that contradict the tariff or would require a tariff change.  

 

You may use the downloadable Word template to circulate your comments within your organization, but you are required to submit comments in the commenting tool here prior to the deadline for consideration.

WRAP - PRC
BPM 106 - Qualifying Contracts
DOWNLOAD

DRAFT - V0.2 BPM 106 - Q… (.pdf)
Last updated March 21, 2024

PROMPTS
  • 01: Please supply any comments related to the Introduction, Definitions, or Background sections.
  • 02: Please supply any comments related to the Contracts Eligible for QCC value section (3).
  • 03: Please supply any comments related to the Contracts Eligible for QCC value - Resource-Specific Capacity Agreements section (3.1).
  • 04: Please supply any comments related to the Contracts Eligible for QCC value - System Sale section (3.2).
  • 05: Please supply any comments related to the Joint Contract Accreditation Forms section (4).
  • 06: Please supply any comments related to the Calculating Net Contract QCC section (5).
  • 07: Please supply any comments related to the Resource Adequacy Transfers (RA Transfers) section (6).
  • 08: Please supply any comments related to Appendix A.
  • 09: Please supply any comments related to Appendix B.
  • 10: Please supply any comments related to Appendix C.
  • 11: Please supply any comments related to Appendix D.
  • General Comment

COMMENTS RECEIVED  |  DOWNLOAD ALL  |  VIEW AGGREGATED

Author & Organization Date General Comment
Sachi B. | Puget Sou… April 1, 2024, 2:38 p.m.

There have been discussions in the past for JCAF requirements rela…

Tyler M. | Arizona P… April 11, 2024, 9:57 a.m.

We believe that BPM 106 should also cover information related the …

Raj H. | PWX April 11, 2024, 11:49 a.m. No comment.
Benjamin F. | Pacificor… April 11, 2024, 2:20 p.m.

PacifiCorp understands and supports the need to seek assurances ca…

Lindsey S. | NVE April 11, 2024, 2:49 p.m.

NV Energy appreciates the opportunity to comment on BPM 106 and of…

Matt H. | BPA April 11, 2024, 3:14 p.m.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment
Michael W. | Seattle C… April 11, 2024, 3:41 p.m.

City Light suggest that BPM 106 - Qualifying Contracts cannot be a…

Jerret F. | SRP April 11, 2024, 3:45 p.m.

SRP is encouraged by the WPP’s ongoing efforts in the develo…

Nicole B. | Idaho Pow… April 11, 2024, 4:25 p.m.

As a general comment, the BPM should be consistent with the tariff…


Commenting closed on April 11, 2024.