The Qualifying Contracts Business Practice Manual (BPM) fits into a suite of BPMs related to the Forward Showing Program of the WRAP.
Please provide comments on the BPM 106 draft posted. Note that the BPM is meant to reflect the WRAP tariff, and comments on the BPM should not include suggestions that contradict the tariff or would require a tariff change.
You may use the downloadable Word template to circulate your comments within your organization, but you are required to submit comments in the commenting tool here prior to the deadline for consideration.
101: Please supply any comments related to the Introduction, Definitions, or Background sections.202: Please supply any comments related to the Contracts Eligible for QCC value section (3).303: Please supply any comments related to the Contracts Eligible for QCC value - Resource-Specific Capacity Agreements section (3.1).404: Please supply any comments related to the Contracts Eligible for QCC value - System Sale section (3.2).505: Please supply any comments related to the Joint Contract Accreditation Forms section (4).606: Please supply any comments related to the Calculating Net Contract QCC section (5).707: Please supply any comments related to the Resource Adequacy Transfers (RA Transfers) section (6).808: Please supply any comments related to Appendix A.909: Please supply any comments related to Appendix B.1010: Please supply any comments related to Appendix C.1111: Please supply any comments related to Appendix D.12General Comment
Comment Topic
Overview
The Qualifying Contracts Business Practice Manual (BPM) fits into a suite of BPMs related to the Forward Showing Program of the WRAP.
Please provide comments on the BPM 106 draft posted. Note that the BPM is meant to reflect the WRAP tariff, and comments on the BPM should not include suggestions that contradict the tariff or would require a tariff change.
You may use the downloadable Word template to circulate your comments within your organization, but you are required to submit comments in the commenting tool here prior to the deadline for consideration.
Response Guide
Prompts
Responses
Comments Received
Sachi B. / Puget Sound Energy
There have been discussions in the past for JCAF requirements relating to PURPA and other…
Tyler M. / Arizona Public Se…
We believe that BPM 106 should also cover information related the risk of over/under perf…
Raj H. / PWX
No general comment submitted.
Benjamin F. / PacifiCorp Energy…
PacifiCorp understands and supports the need to seek assurances capacity from outside the…
Lindsey S. / NVE
NV Energy appreciates the opportunity to comment on BPM 106 and offers additional general…
Matt H. / BPA
Thank you for the opportunity to comment
Michael W. / Seattle City Light
City Light suggest that BPM 106 - Qualifying Contracts cannot be approved as a business p…
Jerret F. / SRP
SRP is encouraged by the WPP’s ongoing efforts in the developing of WRAP BPMs and h…
Nicole B. / Idaho Power Compa…
As a general comment, the BPM should be consistent with the tariff unless an explicit cha…