SRP suggests the WPP clarify whether there are any specific actions required between WRAP participants for confirming or declining energy deployment that are not an available action in the PIT.
No response submitted.
No comments at this time.
No response submitted.
First sentence of the section is a bit confusing as it implies that the deficient participant has to confirm energy on the preschedule day. Perhaps it can be rewritten in the following way can be rewritten as follows -
"A deficient Participant will notify the PO via the PIT of its need for Energy Deployment up to the MW amount of the Participant’s confirmed request for Holdback Requirement as established on the Preschedule Day."
No response submitted.
“Any Participant for which the Program Operator calculated during the Preschedule Day a negative Sharing Requirement for the hour in question shall have zero Holdback Requirement and shall not have any Energy Deployment obligation for that hour.”
While this language is consistent with BPM 204, Tacoma would like to allow for the possibility that a deficit Participant (per the Sharing Calculation) that does not request or Opt-In for Holdback Capacity should still be able to offer resources to the WRAP via Voluntary Holdback. In that case the language above would need to be adjusted.