City Light has no comment on this section.

1.  As discussed in the workgroup the term "material" when referring to differences is not equitable between participants.  A threshold/percentage/amount is better used in this context.  BPA suggests discussion with the working group and this language modified to reflect something more tangible.

2.  BPA would like to see a timeline for this statement added:  "Once settlements for the given month have been recalculated a notification will be provided to all Participants."

This section notes a notice of re-calculation will be sent to all Participants; however, it doesn’t expand if those Participants may appeal the re-calculated settlement? Would the re-calculation trigger an additional 90-day dispute period?

SRP recommends the WPP elaborate on the recalibration process and provide clear step-by-step guidance for participants to follow when submitting a request to recalculate the settlements. The guide should detail any required documentation.

On what basis will SPP decide whether potential changes resulting in materially different settlement amount are valid? If we could get an example of this scenario, that would be helpful