01. Do you have any comments on the proposal itself?
SRP appreciates the strong collaboration among Task Force members and WPP staff in developing this proposal. The Task Force discussions were productive and inclusive across organizations and regions, and the resulting language reflects a shared understanding of what should qualify as firm transmission under WRAP. The single definition of WRAP Qualifying Transmission provides a clear, consistent standard for identifying firm transmission and reflects the Task Force’s unanimous agreement. This collaborative outcome strengthens the program, and SRP thanks all participants for their time and effort in reaching a well-supported solution.
02. Do you have any comments on the WRAP Qualifying Transmission definition, including whether the proposed language in part (iii) provides sufficient clarity for non-NERC priority transmission products such as CAISO’s Priority Wheeling Through?
Part (iii) reflects the Task Force’s collaboration, and it provides sufficient clarity for non-NERC labeled firm transmission products to be recognized by WRAP.
03. Do you have any questions regarding the redlines to the WRAP Tariff?
No response submitted.
04. Do you have any questions regarding the redlines to BPM 103 – Participant Forward Showing Capacity Requirements?
No response submitted.
05. Do you have any questions regarding the redlines to BPM 106 – Qualifying Contracts?
No response submitted.
06. Do you have any questions regarding the redlines to BPM 108 – Forward Showing Submittal Process?
No response submitted.
07. Do you have any questions regarding the redlines to BPM 202 – Participant Sharing Calculation Inputs?
No response submitted.
08. Do you have any questions regarding the redlines to BPM 204 – Holdback Requirement?
No response submitted.
09. Do you have any questions regarding the redlines to BPM 209 – Energy Delivery Failure Charge?
No response submitted.
General Comment
SRP is encouraged by the WPP’s ongoing efforts to complete the 2025 Work Plan.