April 14, 2026, 1:18 p.m.
Tacoma Power supports the outcomes described in this section. Given the substantive forward showing design changes proposed by the current PRM Task Force, the first task of any Shoulder Month PRM (SCL #12) analysis should be to review the PRM Task Force proposal to determine whether further PRM changes are needed or whether the forward showing process with the PRM Task Force proposals sufficiently meets participant needs. It may be that with the PRM Task Force’s proposed changes to the forward showing, particularly the proposed shortening of the seasons, a second PRM change process is unnecessary.
April 14, 2026, 1:45 p.m.
No response submitted.
April 14, 2026, 3:10 p.m.
No response submitted.
April 14, 2026, 3:16 p.m.
Grid United appreciates and strongly supports the PRC’s stated commitment to flexibility in the Draft 2026 Workplan, including its recognition that while Concept Prioritization should remain the foundation of the Workplan, the PRC should retain discretion to respond to special circumstances such as shifts in priorities, staffing availability, or workstream readiness. We are encouraged by this approach and view it as particularly relevant to 2025‑CRF‑09/10 because it was initially voted as the second top priority for 2026. Should the proposed white paper and associated analytical work result in a clear, well‑supported preliminary policy proposal with broad stakeholder alignment, Grid United respectfully requests that the PRC consider using this built‑in flexibility to reassess the timing and priority of this effort. Doing so would be consistent with the Workplan’s stated intent and would allow the PRC to advance a mature, high‑value policy outcome without disrupting near‑term binding‑season readiness.
April 15, 2026, 9:43 a.m.
No response submitted.
April 15, 2026, 3:16 p.m.
No response submitted.
April 15, 2026, 3:22 p.m.
No response submitted.
April 16, 2026, 9:26 a.m.
No response submitted.