SRP appreciates the document's clear description of Task Force composition and the role of the Lead Sponsor. However, for the sake of transparency and trust-building among participants, we recommend providing more information about the selection process for Lead Sponsors and the criteria considered. We appreciate the document's emphasis on the diversity of perspectives within Task Forces. Additionally, SRP notes that Section 3.1 does not clearly define the makeup of the Task Force. It indicates it "may include members of the PRC or others with specific subject matter expertise." This leaves room for interpretation regarding Task Force composition. We recommend further defining the criteria for Task Force membership, particularly concerning whether members of the public can nominate themselves and the eligibility of third-party consultants nominated by WRAP participants. Clarifying these aspects will enhance the transparency and inclusivity of the Task Force creation process. 

It is unclear to us if Task Force membership is limited to only WRAP Participants, or can other interested parties and stakeholders be nominated for consideration of inclusion in the Task Force by the PRC?