The beginning of this section contradicts the previous section in which the PRC determines to recommend to RAPC since it will go to RAPC either way. We should probably include that in the sections above so that readers do not assume that if it is not recommended by PRC that it stops because they don’t read section 4.4.

In section 4.4.2.1 line 3 mentions “approved” by RAPC but it appears RAPC is recommending, terminology alignment needed here again we think. Also, in this section it says PRC will summarize the comments received, is this suppose to be the PRC or is it RAPC that would do this since that is the body that changed the Proposal and initiated the need for the additional two-week comment period?

In section 4.4.3.1 the Proposal could be appealed to the Board due to RAPC rejection or for non-action within 30 days after the PRC action by the RAPC. Is the 30 days business or calendar days, and is this time sufficient to make the agenda of a RAPC for action on the Proposal? If the appeal is based on non-action in the timeframe when does an appellant need to inform the Board of it’s appeal by and how would they do so?