"Forced Outage” is not a defined term in the Tariff, rather the lower case “forced outage” is primarily used (with the possible exception of section 20.1.1 where change in Forced Outages is defined). Consider whether a consistent definition / defined term is worthwhile.
Powerex suggests the language on forced outages be more inclusive to instances where a forced outage is caused by a transmission outage or derate. Removing the phrase “associated with imports” would better align with the change in Forced Outages definition in Section 20.1.1
No response submitted.
No response submitted.
Having a name that sets apart the “Operating Day” in question from all the Operating Days that precede and follow it during a time period would provide some clarity – e.g. having an “identified Operating Day” so that it is clear that there is a Preschedule Day for the identified Operating Day, but that the Preschedule Day is also its own Operating Day. While every day during the season is an Operating Day, the provisions of Section 19 as written apply to a single identified Operating Day. Performance obligations during the seven days preceding an identified Operating Day and on the identified Operating Day itself include the obligations accruing to each of the seven preceding Operating Days and the seven following Operating Days.
No response submitted.
Section 19.1 infers that the sharing calc is always indicative. It should state that the sharing calc is binding on the preschedule day.
No comments at this time.